Influence of crosslinking and process parameters on the separation performance of polydimethylsiloxane nanofiltration membranes
journal contribution
posted on 2009-06-03, 14:13authored byJ.P. Robinson, Steve Tarleton, Katrin Ebert, C.R. Millington, Arian Nijmeijer
The separation of organic solutes in organic solvents was assessed using dense
poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) membranes with different degrees of crosslinking and varying
thickness of the dense PDMS layer. The predominant rejection mechanism for low-polarity organic
solutes is shown to occur via size exclusion, with the rejection also being dependent on the degree
of membrane crosslinking, the swelling propensity of the membrane/feed stream and the transmembrane
pressure. It is postulated that the size-exclusion mechanism arises as a consequence
of the relatively large degree of swelling of the PDMS material (up to 300%), which induces
appreciable regions between the polymer chains for solvent and solute transport to take place.
The degree of swelling governs the relative size of the transport regions within the membrane and
hence the overall solvent flux and solute rejection characteristics. It is shown that solvent-solute
coupling plays a major role in solute transport, with the convective element of solute flow
increasing as the degree of swelling increases and solute size decreases. Despite the existence of
a size-exclusion mechanism it is difficult to rule out the solution-diffusion model as an interpretation
of the data, however it is also demonstrated that models based on pore-flow can adequately define
the experimental data. The similarities between the two approaches are discussed, and potential
evidence of a transition between solution-diffusion and pore flow is introduced.
History
School
Aeronautical, Automotive, Chemical and Materials Engineering
Department
Chemical Engineering
Citation
TARLETON, E.S. ... et al, 2005. Influence of crosslinking and process parameters on the separation performance of polydimethylsiloxane nanofiltration membranes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 44 (9), pp. 3238-3248