There is widespread evidence that geographical borders reduce trade. This paper
presents a theoretical model capable of providing a succinct comparison of three broad forms of trade barriers involving i) trade costs, ii) localized tastes, and iii) information frictions. Despite being traditionally under-researched, it provides the stark finding that information frictions often provide the relatively more powerful marginal effect in reducing cross-border trade, and associated levels of welfare. This result remains robust under a number of extensions that further document the roles of product differentiation and alternative forms of trade costs.
History
School
Business and Economics
Department
Economics
Published in
Information Economics and Policy
Pages
? - ? (9)
Citation
WILSON, C.M., 2017. Information matters: a theoretical comparison of some cross-border trade barriers. Information Economics and Policy, 37, pp. 52-60.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Acceptance date
2016-10-04
Publication date
2017
Notes
This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Information Economics and Policy and the definitive published version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.10.002