Loughborough University
Browse
Clayton&Gilmore_ZDM.pdf (475.05 kB)

Inhibition in dot comparison tasks

Download (475.05 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-03-17, 09:14 authored by Sarah Clayton, Camilla GilmoreCamilla Gilmore
Dot comparison tasks are commonly used to index an individual’s Approximate Number System (ANS) acuity, but the cognitive processes involved in completing these tasks are poorly understood. Here we investigated how factors including numerosity ratio, set size and visual cues influence task performance. Forty-­four children aged 7-­9 years completed a dot comparison task with a range of to-­be-­compared numerosities. We found that as the size of the numerosities increased, with ratios held constant, accuracy decreased due to the heightened salience of incongruent visual information. Furthermore, in trials with larger numerosities participants’ accuracies were influenced more by the convex hull of the array than the average dot size. The numerosity ratio between the arrays in each trial was an important predictor for all set sizes. We argue that these findings are consistent with a ‘competing processes’ inhibition-­based account, where accuracy scores are influenced by individual differences in both ANS acuity and inhibitory control skills.

Funding

This paper was supported by a Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship.

History

School

  • Science

Department

  • Mathematics Education Centre

Published in

ZDM: Mathematics Education

Citation

CLAYTON, S. and GILMORE, C.K., 2015. Inhibition in dot comparison tasks. ZDM: Mathematics Education, 47(5), pp.759-770.

Publisher

© Springer

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publication date

2015

Notes

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0655-2

ISSN

1863-9690

eISSN

1863-9704

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC