Loughborough University
Browse
sustainability-11-06706 (1).pdf (574.45 kB)

Integrating basic urban services for better sanitation outcomes

Download (574.45 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-11-28, 13:45 authored by Rebecca ScottRebecca Scott, Pippa Scott, Peter Hawkins, Isabel Blackett, Andrew Cotton, Alix Lerebours
Rapid urbanization in developing countries demands better integration of planning and delivery of basic services if cities are to be sustainable, healthy and safe. Sanitation improvements are commonly overlooked as investments go towards more visible services such as water supplies and drainage networks. The Sustainable Development Goal for sanitation and hygiene currently remains severely off-track. This paper presents the findings of a Delphi method survey to identify expert consensus on both why and how to integrate sanitation, by which we mean both sewered and non-sewered sanitation services, into other basic urban services (including water supply, drainage, energy and roads) to achieve better sanitation and broader development outcomes, notably for poor citizens. Consensus on why integration is important highlights the physical interdependence of services, where neglect of one service can compromise gains from another investment or service. Consensus on how includes actions to address political priorities and leadership; governance and capacity constraints; clearer planning, procurement and financing mechanisms; and adopting incremental approaches matched to wider urban strategies. It was suggested that achieving these actions would improve accountability, monitoring and service level audits. Experience from previous integrated urban programmes should be incorporated into formulating new sanitation service agreements across all service types. Supported by better-informed dialogue and decision-making between those responsible for urban sanitation and for associated basic services, we suggest integrated and incremental approaches will enable more sustainable urban services planning to achieve ‘quality of life’ outcomes for poor urban residents.

History

School

  • Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering

Published in

Sustainability

Volume

11

Issue

23

Publisher

MDPI AG

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The authors

Publisher statement

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Acceptance date

2019-11-23

Publication date

2019-11-27

Copyright date

2019

eISSN

2071-1050

Language

  • en

Depositor

Ms Rebecca Scott. Deposit date: 28 November 2019

Article number

6706

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC