AttridgeInglisT&R-preprint.pdf (194.5 kB)
Intelligence and negation biases on the Conditional Inference Task: a dual-processes analysis
journal contribution
posted on 2014-04-29, 13:49 authored by Nina Attridge, Matthew InglisMatthew InglisWe examined a large set of conditional inference data compiled from several previous studies and asked three questions: How is normative performance related to intelligence? Does negative conclusion bias stem from Type 1 or Type 2 processing? Does implicit negation bias stem from Type 1 or Type 2 processing? Our analysis demonstrated that rejecting denial of the antecedent and affirmation of the consequent inferences was positively correlated with intelligence, while endorsing modus tollens inferences was not; that the occurrence of negative conclusion bias was related to the extent of Type 2 processing; and that the occurrence of implicit negation bias was not related to the extent of Type 2 processing. We conclude that negative conclusion bias is, at least in part, a product of Type 2 processing, while implicit negation bias is not.
Funding
This work was partially funded by a Royal Society Worshipful Company of Actuaries Education Research Fellowship to M. Inglis.
History
School
- Science
Department
- Mathematics Education Centre
Citation
ATTRIDGE, N. and INGLIS, M., 2014. Intelligence and negation biases on the Conditional Inference Task: a dual-processes analysis. Thinking and Reasoning, 20 (4), pp. 454-471.Publisher
© Taylor & FrancisVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publication date
2014Notes
This article was published in the journal Thinking and Reasoning [© Taylor and Francis]. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.897254ISSN
1354-6783eISSN
1464-0708Publisher version
Language
- en
Administrator link
Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC