text-2014-0011 proofs 4-25-2014 v2.pdf (552.89 kB)
Interactional formats and institutional context: a practical and exploitable distinction in interviews
journal contributionposted on 2016-08-01, 08:40 authored by Jessica Robles, Evelyn Y. Ho
This paper applies practically oriented discourse analysis to focus group interviews using conversation analytic principles to show how interactional qualities demonstrably different to analysts are also treated as such by participants. We take a grounded practical theory perspective to claim that the empirical and practical distinction is an exploitable resource for participants, with important implications for the goals of research interviewing, interviewee participation in focus groups, and analyses thereof. We identify participant techniques for doing and attending to conversational and institutional interaction formats, including turn-taking organization, embodied acts, addressivity, and emotion displays, and how those techniques allow participants to co-construct emergent stances alongside answering questions.
The University of San Francisco’s Jesuit Foundation Grant provided funding for this research.
- Social Sciences
- Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published inText & Talk
CitationROBLES, J. and HO, E., 2014. Interactional formats and institutional context: a practical and exploitable distinction in interviews. Text and Talk, 34 (4), pp.443–465
Publisher© De Gruyter Mouton
- VoR (Version of Record)
Publisher statementThis work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/