Investigating the Influence of Professor Characteristics on Student Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction_JME_FINAL.pdf (391.39 kB)
Download fileInvestigating the influence of professor characteristics on student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: a comparative study
journal contribution
posted on 2013-03-11, 10:24 authored by Thorsten GruberThorsten Gruber, Anthony Lowrie, Glen H. Brodowsky, Alexander E. Reppel, Roediger Voss, Ilma Nur ChowdhuryThis research uses the Kano model of satisfaction to investigate professor characteristics that create student satisfaction as well as those attributes that can cause their dissatisfaction. Kano questionnaires were handed out to 104 undergraduate students at a university in the Southwest and to 147 undergraduate students at a university in the Midwest of the United States. The two resulting Kano maps show the same delighting attributes although other satisfaction attributes are also similar. The findings reveal the importance of the personality of professors and the characteristics of professors that (a) are desired by students, (b) are not desired by students, (c) affect student satisfaction the most, and (d) affect satisfaction the least. The results also demonstrate how professors and universities can focus attention on those attributes most likely to influence satisfaction. No attributes of professors are classified as basic or taken for granted factors by students, although three attributes are excitement factors that have the potential to delight students. The findings illustrate that there is a set of multiple attributes that professors need to possess for satisfying student–professor classroom service encounters. Student populations appear to show strong similarities in their preferences for characteristics of professors that lead to satisfaction and dissatisfaction outcomes.
History
School
- Business and Economics
Department
- Business
Citation
GRUBER, T. ... et al., 2012. Investigating the influence of professor characteristics on student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: a comparative study. Journal of Marketing Education, 34 (2), pp. 165 - 178.Publisher
© SAGE PublicationsVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publication date
2012Notes
This article was published in the Journal of Marketing Education [© SAGE Publications] and the definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0273475312450385ISSN
0273-4753Publisher version
Language
- en