A story of the homeless^LJ autonomy^LJ and anti-social behaviour 3rd upload changes done1.pdf (2.4 MB)
Download fileLife and letting die: a story of the homeless, autonomy, and anti-social behaviour
journal contribution
posted on 2017-03-02, 13:23 authored by Simon StevensIf I were to say that the architecture in our public spaces is ‘really speaking to us’, you would be forgiven for thinking this is a piece about the aesthetics of our cities. In some ways in fact, it is, but not in any artistic sense. I am not discussing a collection of monuments, town houses or grandiose buildings. Alas, the architecture I talk of is more humble and yet perhaps more sinister. There is a message encoded into it, within our parks, streets and centres, which seems to be part of a wider narrative. This essay is an attempt to read it, find out what it says, and consider how that may affect our concept of autonomy, but also, to encourage us to reflect on how we choose to read it: to think on what theoretical framework we should discuss homelessness. The aim is not to necessarily reconceptualize something then, but is more in the tradition of making the familiar seem unfamiliar: not only in what we think, but how we come to think what we do and the extent to which the former is limited by the latter. To achieve this, the leading question I therefore ask is: what does the organization of public space in reaction to a homeless presence tell us about autonomy, and how we think about autonomy?
History
School
- Social Sciences
Department
- Politics and International Studies
Published in
Organization StudiesPages
017084061668613 - 017084061668613Citation
STEVENS, S., 2017. Life and letting die: a story of the homeless, autonomy, and anti-social behaviour. Organization Studies, 38 (5), pp. 669-690.Publisher
SAGE © The AuthorVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceptance date
2016-12-15Publication date
2017Notes
This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Organization Studies and the definitive published version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840616686130.ISSN
0170-8406eISSN
1741-3044Publisher version
Language
- en