Loughborough University
Browse
- No file added yet -

Lockdown duration and training intensity affect sleep behavior in an international sample of 1,454 elite athletes

Download (1.13 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-11-16, 16:35 authored by M Romdhani, HHK Fullagar, JA Vitale, M Nédélec, DE Rae, A Ammar, H Chtourou, RA Al Horani, H Ben Saad, NL Bragazzi, G Dönmez, I Dergaa, T Driss, A Farooq, O Hammouda, N Harroum, B Hassanmirzaei, K Khalladi, S Khemila, LJ Mataruna-Dos-Santos, I Moussa-Chamari, I Mujika, H Muñoz Helú, A Norouzi Fashkhami, LL Paineiras-Domingos, MR Khaneghah, Y Saita, N Souissi, K Trabelsi, JA Washif, J Weber, P Zmijewski, Lee TaylorLee Taylor, S Garbarino, K Chamari

Objective: To investigate the effect of 1) lockdown duration and 2) training intensity on sleep quality and insomnia symptoms in elite athletes. 

Methods: 1,454 elite athletes (24.1 ± 6.7 years; 42% female; 41% individual sports) from 40 countries answered a retrospective, cross-sectional, web-based questionnaire relating to their behavioral habits pre- and during- COVID-19 lockdown, including: 1) Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI); 2) Insomnia severity index (ISI); bespoke questions about 3) napping; and 4) training behaviors. The association between dependent (PSQI and ISI) and independent variables (sleep, napping and training behaviors) was determined with multiple regression and is reported as semi-partial correlation coefficient squared (in percentage). Results: 15% of the sample spent < 1 month, 27% spent 1–2 months and 58% spent > 2 months in lockdown. 29% self-reported maintaining the same training intensity during-lockdown whilst 71% reduced training intensity. PSQI (4.1 ± 2.4 to 5.8 ± 3.1; mean difference (MD): 1.7; 95% confidence interval of the difference (95% CI): 1.6–1.9) and ISI (5.1 ± 4.7 to 7.7 ± 6.4; MD: 2.6; 95% CI: 2.3–2.9) scores were higher during-compared to pre-lockdown, associated (all p < 0.001) with longer sleep onset latency (PSQI: 28%; ISI: 23%), later bedtime (PSQI: 13%; ISI: 14%) and later preferred time of day to train (PSQI: 9%; ISI: 5%) during-lockdown. Those who reduced training intensity during-lockdown showed higher PSQI (p < 0.001; MD: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.87–1.63) and ISI (p < 0.001; MD: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.72–3.27) scores compared to those who maintained training intensity. Although PSQI score was not affected by the lockdown duration, ISI score was higher in athletes who spent > 2 months confined compared to those who spent < 1 month (p < 0.001; MD: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.26–2.3).

Conclusion: Reducing training intensity during the COVID-19-induced lockdown was associated with lower sleep quality and higher insomnia severity in elite athletes. Lockdown duration had further disrupting effects on elite athletes’ sleep behavior. These findings could be of relevance in future lockdown or lockdown-like situations (e.g., prolonged illness, injury, and quarantine after international travel).

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Published in

Frontiers in Physiology

Volume

13

Publisher

Frontiers Media

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The Authors

Publisher statement

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Frontiers Media under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

2022-04-27

Publication date

2022-06-15

Copyright date

2022

eISSN

1664-042X

Language

  • en

Depositor

Deposit date: 16 November 2022

Article number

904778

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC