posted on 2012-01-20, 10:40authored byGeorge HavenithGeorge Havenith, Alison Fogarty, Rebecca Bartlett, Caroline J. Smith, Vincent Ventenat
Body sweat distribution over the upper body in nine clothed male and female runners of equal
3 fitness while running at 65% V O2max and subsequent 15 minute rest in a moderate climate
4 (25ºC, 53% rh) was investigated using technical absorbent materials to collect the sweat
5 produced. No significant difference in whole body mass loss (male 474 SD 80; female 420 SD
6 114 g.m-2.h-1) nor surface weighted average of all tested zones for exercise (male 636 SD 165;
7 female 565 SD 222 g.m-2.h-1) nor rest (male 159 SD 46; female 212 SD 75 g.m-2.h-1) were
8 observed. Local sweat rate (LSR) ranges were large and overlapped substantially in most
9 areas. Males showed higher LSR for the mid-front (p<0.05), sides (p<0.05), and mid lateral
10 back (p<0.01) compare to females. Both sexes showed similar sweat distribution patterns over
11 the upper body with some exceptions. Males showed higher relative (local to overall) sweat
12 rates than females for the mid lateral back (p<0.001), while it was lower for the upper arm
13 (p<0.001), lateral lower back (p<0.05), and upper central back (p<0.05). Sweating in both
14 sexes was highest along the spine, and higher on the back as a whole than the chest as a
15 whole. Upper arm sweat rate was lowest. Males showed a higher ratio of highest to lowest
16 LSR (4.4 versus 2.8; p<0.05). The present study has provided more detailed information,
17 based on more subjects, on upper body sweat distribution than previously available, which can
18 be used in clothing design, thermo-physiological modelling, and thermal manikin design.
History
School
Design
Citation
HAVENITH, G....et al., 2008. Male and female upper body sweat distribution during running measured with technical absorbents. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 104 (2), pp. 245 - 255