posted on 2025-07-11, 10:04authored byGaia Vitrano, Guido Jacopo Luca Micheli, Giuseppe Pacifico, Jacopo Ranuccio, Donato MasiDonato Masi, Jafar Rezaei
<p dir="ltr"><b>Purpose</b>: Supplier Selection (SS) and Order Allocation (OA) are strategic procurement processes crucial for mitigating supply chain uncertainties and potentially becoming a competitive advantage for companies in the mitigation strategies. Most of the previous studies dealing with SS and OA focused on straight rebuy situations, while there is a limited number of studies focusing on modified rebuy and new task situations, where uncertainty is higher, and comparison between historical and new suppliers is needed in a world, where the demand for new, technologically advanced products and services keeps increasing, pushing companies to continuously search for new suppliers.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Approach</b>: Considering this gap, this paper proposes a Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model to compare new and historical suppliers, with limited knowledge about the new suppliers, using measurable and forecastable decision criteria through a scenario planning approach that considers decision markers’ different risk attitudes in evaluating suppliers’ performance. The proposed model adopts the Best-Worst Method and a two?stage Linear Programming model. The effectiveness of the model has been tested in a real industrial setting.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Findings</b>: This model would support companies in their decision-making process to anticipate and address potential risks inherent in SS and OA decisions, thus enhancing supply chain resilience and agility in dynamic market environments.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Originality</b>: The proposed model, requiring minimal computational resources, is accessible to a broad range of companies. It fills a literature gap by enabling comparison between new and historical suppliers in modified rebuy and new task situations, where uncertainty is higher, thereby enhancing supply chain decision making.</p>
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode