Loughborough University
Browse

Mapping the movement for climate change and health in England: a descriptive review and theory of change analysis

Download (502.55 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-11-15, 12:07 authored by Rita Issa, Catherine Baker, Rosie Spooner, Rob Abrams, Anya Gopfert, Megan Evans, Guy AitchisonGuy Aitchison
Aims
There are a growing number of organisations working to address the connections between climate change and health. This paper introduces the concept of ‘theories of change’ - the methodology by which organisations or movements hope to bring about social change - and applies it to the current climate change and health movement in England. Through movement mapping, the paper describes and offers reflections on the climate change and health ecosystem in England.
Methods
Organisations working on climate change and health in England were identified and publicly available information was collated to map movement characteristics, target stakeholders and methodologies deployed, using an inductive, iterative approach.
Results
98 organisations working on health and climate change (and/or sustainability) were initially identified, of which 70 met the inclusion criteria. Most organisations target 2 or more stakeholders, with healthcare workers, management structures (Trusts and CCGs) and government being most commonly cited. Methodological approaches identified include: Formal education programmes; Awareness-raising; Purchasing-procurement power; Advocacy; Financial; Media-messaging; Networking; Knowledge generation; and Policy making, of which education, awareness-raising, and advocacy most commonly used.
Conclusions
There is a tendency within climate change and health organisations in England to focus on individual level and sectoral change, over system change. More could be made of the potential for the healthcare professions’ voice for the wider climate movement. Given the rapid boom of climate change and health organisations in recent years, a mindset shift within the movement, to recognise different players as part of a cohesive ecosystem with better coordination and collaboration, may reduce unnecessary work and facilitate more cohesive outcomes.

History

School

  • Social Sciences and Humanities

Department

  • International Relations, Politics and History

Published in

Perspectives in Public Health

Volume

141

Issue

6

Pages

328-337

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© Royal Society for Public Health

Publisher statement

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by SAGE under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

2021-10-20

Publication date

2021-11-24

Copyright date

2021

ISSN

1757-9139

eISSN

1757-9147

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr Guy Aitchison. Deposit date: 14 November 2021

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC