Math4Speed - a freely available measure of arithmetic fluency
We introduce the Math4Speed (M4S), a paper-and-pencil measure incorporating the four arithmetic operations with items of varying complexity. M4S consists of 50 addition, 50 subtraction, 50 multiplication, and 50 division problems, limited to 2 min per operation. The psychometric evaluation was conducted by combining convenience samples of young adults (N = 1165), who were mainly university students (77.2%), from six European countries (UK, Belgium, Germany, Poland, Greece, and Spain). Reliability and validity were satisfactory. Construct validity was reflected in the largest associations between inverse operations (e.g., multiplication and division). Convergent and divergent validity were reflected in higher associations of the M4S with other arithmetic measures than with a spelling test. As a freely available measure, M4S will be widely accessible and will in this first step allow cross-study comparison for typical experimental samples. In the next step, we invite all researchers to contribute to further development of M4S by providing more culturally diverse, minority or representative samples to broaden the use cases of this screening of arithmetic fluency and enable more generalizability. Interested contributors can get in contact via email (math4speed@psychologie.uni-tuebingen.de).
Funding
Economic and Social Research Council
DFG – German Research Foundation (NU 265/5-1; 381713393 within the Research Unit FOR2718 Modal and Amodal Cognition, and NU 265/3-1)
National Science Centre, Poland (2014/15/G/HS6/04604)
LEAD Graduate School & Research Network (GSC1028, funded within the Excellence Initiative of the German federal and state governments)
Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Wuerttemberg, the European Social Fund
German Research Foundation
Friedrich Ebert Foundation
Research Foundation Flanders
Universidad de Málaga
History
School
- Science
Published in
Canadian Journal of Experimental PsychologyPublisher
Canadian Psychological AssociationVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Rights holder
© Canadian Psychological AssociationPublisher statement
This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the CPA journal. It is not the copy of record.Acceptance date
2024-06-27Publication date
2025-01-01Copyright date
2024ISSN
1196-1961eISSN
1878-7290Publisher version
Language
- en