Within mathematics education research, there has been a strong focus on students’ understanding of
mathematical equivalence because of its key role in the development of mathematics skills. One of the
most frequently used tools to assess students’ understanding of equivalence has been the Mathematical
Equivalence Assessment (MEA) (Rittle-Johnson et al., 2011). In this study, we investigate for the first
time the cross-cultural measurement invariance of an adaptation of the MEA. This included a sample
(N = 2760) of students aged 8 – 12 years old from China, England, New Zealand, South Korea, Turkey,
and US to examine whether the same construct is being measured across all countries. Configural and
partial scalar invariance was established for a two-factor, 11-item version of the adapted MEA. There
were significant mean differences across countries, with students from China performing better and
students from New Zealand performing worse than the rest of the sample.
This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Studies in Educational Evaluation and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101046.