posted on 2019-01-08, 15:53authored byFran Azpitarte
This paper is concerned with the analysis of the wealth dimension of poverty in developed
countries, which can hardly be measured by means of the information on household income. We
focus in identifying the group of households that lack enough wealth holdings to sustain them
during a period of economic crisis in order to quantify asset poverty, and its demographic weight,
in two industrialized countries with particularly different household demographics and saving
attitudes such as Spain and the United Kingdom. Our results show that the age profile of the
asset poor is remarkably similar in the two countries. In both it is individuals in households whose
head is under 45 years old who are more likely to be asset poor. However, some country-specific
differences also arise. For instance, the incidence of wealth poverty in the United Kingdom is
about twice that of Spain. Using counterfactual analysis we find that, although the different
household demographics clearly contribute importantly to this result, there remains a significant
part of the asset-poverty gap which is not explained by this relevant factor.
Funding
This research was supported from the Xunta de Galicia (Programa de Estruturación de Unidades de
Investigación en Humanidades e Ciencias Sociais 2006/33 and FEDER founds) and the Spanish Ministerio de
Ciencia e Innovación (SEJ2007-67911-C03-01/ECON).
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published in
The Journal of Economic Inequality
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
87 - 110
Citation
AZPITARTE, F., 2011. Measurement and identification of asset-poor households: a cross-national comparison of Spain and the United Kingdom. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(1), pp. 87 - 110.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publication date
2011
Notes
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in The Journal of Economic Inequality. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9135-2