Media discourses of low carbon housing - pre-publication.pdf (212.17 kB)
Download fileMedia discourses of low carbon housing: the marginalisation of social and behavioural dimensions within the British broadsheet press
journal contribution
posted on 2015-12-09, 14:43 authored by Catherine Cherry, Christina Hopfe, Brian MacGillivray, Nick PidgeonDecarbonising housing is a key UK government policy to mitigate climate change. Using discourse analysis,
we assess how low carbon housing is portrayed within British broadsheet media. Three distinct storylines
were identified. Dominating the discourse, Zero carbon housing promotes new-build, low carbon houses as
offering high technology solutions to the climate problem. Retrofitting homes emphasises the need to reduce
emissions within existing housing, tackling both climate change and rising fuel prices. A more marginal
discourse, Sustainable living, frames low carbon houses as related to individual identities and ‘off-grid’ or
greener lifestyles. Our analysis demonstrates that technical and economic paradigms dominate media
discourse on low carbon housing, marginalising social and behavioural aspects.
Funding
This research was supported by a studentship from the Sustainable Places Research Institute at Cardiff University.
History
School
- Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering
Published in
Public Understanding of ScienceVolume
24Issue
3Pages
302 - 310Citation
CHERRY, C. ... et al, 2015. Media discourses of low carbon housing: the marginalisation of social and behavioural dimensions within the British broadsheet press. Public Understanding of Science, 24 (3), pp. 302 - 310.Publisher
Sage / © The AuthorsVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Publication date
2015Notes
This is the accepted version of an article subsequently published in the journal, Public Understanding of Science [Sage / © The Authors]. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662513512442ISSN
0963-6625eISSN
1361-6609Publisher version
Language
- en