posted on 2022-03-08, 16:33authored byRichard Black, Alice Bellagamba, Ester Botta, Ebrima Cessay, Dramane Cissokho, Michelle Engeler, Audrey Lenoël, Christina OelgemöllerChristina Oelgemöller, Bruno Riccio, Papa Sakho, Abdoulaye Wotem Somparé, Elia Vitturini, Guido Zingar
The notion of migration as being at least partly about ‘choice’ is deeply rooted in both academic thought
and public policy. Recent contributions have considered migration choice as step-wise in nature,
involving a separation between ‘aspiration’ and ‘ability’ to migrate, whilst stressing a range of noneconomic
factors that influence migration choices. But such nuances have not prevented the emergence
of a significant area of public policy that seeks to influence choices to migrate from Africa through
‘irregular’ channels, or at all, through a range of development interventions. This paper explores
evidence from West Africa on how young people formulate the boundaries of such choice. Drawing on
approaches in anthropology and elsewhere that stress the value of a ‘future-orientated’ lens, we show
how present uncertainty is a central framing that fundamentally limits the value of thinking about
migration as a choice. This has important implications for policy on ‘migration and development’.
Funding
The research underpinning this paper was supported financially by the International Organisation for Migration, as part of the ‘Safety, Support and Solutions: Phase 2’ (SSSII) programme, which was in turn funded by DFID (now FCDO).
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Springer under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/