Misconceptions of the order of operations and associativity use
Background
Conceptual knowledge of arithmetic is essential for progressing in mathematics. Associativity is one concept, which permits some problems to be solved in different ways; for example, solving ‘a + b – c’ by ‘b – c’ then ‘+a’ is a ‘shortcut’ strategy derived from associativity. However, individuals struggle to apply associativity and misconceptions of the order of operations may be one factor that is responsible.
Aims
To investigate whether misconceptions of the order of operations hinder associativity shortcut use.
Samples
76 (Study 1) and 130 (Study 2) adults aged 18–60 years participated.
Method
In Study 1, we developed a novel instrument that quantitatively measures how people interpret the order of operations. In Study 2, we conducted a well-powered, pre-registered experiment to investigate whether reminding individuals of the correct order of operations improved a) knowledge of the order of operations and b) associativity shortcut use.
Results
We found that only 16% of adults fully understood the order of operations and almost 50% had specific ‘literal’ and ‘left-to-right’ misconceptions of acronyms used to teach it. Those with misconceptions were less likely to use associativity shortcut. Reminding individuals of the order of operations reduced misconceptions of the order of operations but did not improve associativity shortcut use.
Conclusions
Misconceptions of the order of operations hinder the application of associativity shortcut strategies. Our findings have theoretical impact on the relationship between procedural and conceptual knowledge of arithmetic and have practical benefits for teachers who could use our instrument to identify misconceptions.
Funding
PhD Studentship from Loughborough University Doctoral college
Research England
Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship
History
School
- Science
Department
- Mathematics Education
Published in
Learning and InstructionVolume
97Issue
2025Publisher
ElsevierVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Rights holder
© ElsevierPublisher statement
This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceptance date
2024-12-20Publication date
2025-02-25Copyright date
2024ISSN
0959-4752eISSN
1873-3263Publisher version
Language
- en