Loughborough University
Browse
- No file added yet -

Multum in Parvo: ‘A place for everything and everything in its place’. Modernism, space-saving bedroom furniture and the compactom wardrobe

Download (142.26 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2014-06-18, 13:59 authored by Clive EdwardsClive Edwards
Particular modernist issues around time and space-saving and organisation influenced wardrobe design. These ideas, initially developed for industry and the office, eventually reached the domestic in the kitchen and bedroom. Using the concepts of design evolution and redesign, the article considers how, during the early twentieth century, the planned wardrobe space gradually developed into a defined storage system for both male and female garments and accessories. Following a brief consideration of modernism, space and storage, and the evolutionary development of the wardrobe as a space-saving and organising space, this article examines the Compactom wardrobe range, to demonstrate how a piece of furniture reflects the contexts of the parts of society that used it. Designed for both men and women, it seemed to address a number of issues, including concerns about efficiency, loss of domestic staff, clothes maintenance and middle-class identity. Using a range of contemporary influences from time and motion studies to travel goods, the case study of the Compactom wardrobe between 1920 and the 1950s demonstrates how designers integrated ideas of methodical and rational use of space into a range of wardrobes to offer the supposed benefits of a tidy and orderly life in a period of rapid change.

History

School

  • The Arts, English and Drama

Department

  • Arts

Published in

Journal of Design History

Volume

27

Issue

1

Pages

17 - 37 (21)

Citation

EDWARDS, C., 2014. Multum in Parvo: ‘A place for everything and everything in its place’. Modernism, space-saving bedroom furniture and the compactom wardrobe. Journal of Design History, 27 (1), pp.17-37.

Publisher

Oxford University Press on behalf of The Design History Society / © The Author

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publication date

2014

Notes

This article was published in the Journal of Design History [Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Design History Society / © The Author]. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jdh/ept018

ISSN

0952-4649

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC