The distinction between native and alien species is a main tenet of various natural
sciences, invasion biology in particular. However, it is also a contested one, as it does not reflect the
biological features of a species, but only its place of origin and migration history. The present article
offers a brief genealogy of the native/alien divide and argues that central to this binary is a national
thinking which divides the world into distinct (national) units, enclosed by (natural) borders, with a
unique (native) population attached to these spatial units. The article illustrates this argument by
looking at two interrelated processes: the nationalisation of nature, by which the national thinking
intervenes as an organising principle in determining ecological inclusion/exclusion, and the
naturalisation of the nation, through which the nation is given an ontological status. Taken together
these two processes confirm the continuing salience of the nation as a b-ordering principle actively
constituting both the social and natural world, also in times of anthropogenic changes and increasing
people’s mobility.
History
School
Social Sciences and Humanities
Department
Geography and Environment
Published in
Area
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
303-310
Citation
Antonsich, M. (2020). Natives and aliens: who and what belongs in nature and in the nation? Area, 53(2), pp. 303-310.
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Antonsich, M. (2020). Natives and aliens: who and what belongs in nature and in the nation? Area, 53(2), pp. 303-310, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12679. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions