Over the past decade much has been written about the centrality of city-regions to
accounts of economic success. But despite a rich and varied literature highlighting
the importance of city-centric capitalism, the concept of the city-region remains
ambiguous. Defined in economic terms, all too often what is missing from these
accounts is how city-regions are constructed politically, and the processes by which
they are rendered visible spaces. While recent interventions have done much to
advance debates on the former, this paper explores the struggle to define, delimit
and designate city-regions through recent endeavours to construct a spatial map of
city-regions in England. The aim is to demonstrate how the processes by which city-regions
are constructed politically are the mediated outcome of trans-regional
economic flows and political claims to territory. The paper concludes by relating
these findings to ongoing debates around state, space and scalar geographies, and
speculates what they might mean for the future of city-regional debate.
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Geography and Environment
Citation
HARRISON, J., 2010. Networks of connectivity, territorial fragmentation, uneven development: the new politics of city regionalism. Political Geography, 29 (1), pp. 17-27.