revised and submitted 17_4_03 single ir.pdf (166.79 kB)
Download file

Noise and air quality valuations: evidence from stated preference residential choice models

Download (166.79 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 30.05.2007, 10:08 by Mark Wardman, Abigail Bristow
This paper reports on research which has estimated valuations of changes in traffic related noise levels and air quality and which contributes to the body of knowledge and to methodology in this area. There are several novel aspects of this research. Firstly, there have been relatively few stated preference studies of the monetary valuations of traffic related noise and air quality. A feature of this analysis is the examination of variations in values according to the size and sign of the environmental change, the currently experienced level of the attribute and various socio-economic factors. Secondly, the important issue of presentation is addressed, with two different methods used in the valuation of air quality and links made between valuations and physical measures. Thirdly, the results from stated preference and the contingent valuation method are compared. Finally, we bring together evidence from other studies and compare them with the findings obtained here.

History

School

  • Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering

Citation

WARDMAN, M. and BRISTOW, A.L. 2004. Noise and air quality valuations: evidence from stated preference residential choice models. Transportation Research D, 9 (1), pp. 1-27

Publisher

© Elsevier

Publication date

2004

Notes

This article was published in the journal, Transporation Research D [© Elsevier]. The definitive version is available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13619209.

ISSN

1361-9209

Language

en