posted on 2006-02-08, 17:56authored byGraham Farrell, Ken Clark, Dan Ellingworth, Ken Pease
Empirical work has shown that high crime areas have disproportionate amounts of
repeat victimisation. However, there is inadequate theoretical explanation. As a move
towards a theory we consider a mathematical model of crime rates grounded in
routine activity theory. Using the binomial distribution, victimisation is measured as a
series of Bernoulli trials, with crime measured for each of incidence (crimes per
capita), prevalence (victims per capita), and concentration (crimes per victim). The
model is then revised so that a proportion of targets progress to become chronically
victimised "supertargets". The notion of supertargets is introduced to refer to the 3 or
4 percent of chronically victimised targets that account for around 40 percent of
victimisation. We demonstrate theory-testing relating to crime requires the inclusion
of the crime concentration rate to incorporate repeat victimisation and indicate how
mathematical modelling may, in turn, illuminate the crime concentration predictions
of routine activity theory.
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Research Unit
Midlands Centre for Criminology and Criminal Justice
Pages
277504 bytes
Citation
FARRELL, G., CLARK, K., ELLINGWORTH, D. and PEASE, K., 2005. Of targets and supertargets: a routine activity theory of high crime rates. Internet Journal of Criminology.