On the complexities of Christopher Coker and Nicholas Rengger
The 21st Century is proving to be a bloody one. The wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and now Ukraine and Gaza have surely proved that war has not, as many had hoped, been unlearnt. Death, sacrifice, and inhumanity remain our constant companions. The study of war has therefore never been more important. In that spirit, this piece revisits the work of two renowned scholars: the late Christopher Coker and the late Nicholas Rengger. Both wrote prolifically on politics, ethics, soldiering, and war. Both were preoccupied with the judgements made for and in war. Coker has been regarded as a somewhat conservative figure, locked into an outmoded view of war as heroic, while Rengger, a political theorist, has not always appeared of direct relevance to understanding modern war. We argue that both scholars bear a rereading.
History
School
- Social Sciences and Humanities
Department
- International Relations, Politics and History
Published in
International PoliticsPublisher
SpringerVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Rights holder
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature LimitedPublisher statement
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00633-1.Acceptance date
2024-10-05Publication date
2024-11-02Copyright date
2024ISSN
1384-5748eISSN
1740-3898Publisher version
Language
- en