Parental care results in a greater mutation load, for which it is also a phenotypic antidote
Benevolent social behaviours, such as parental care, are thought to enable mildly deleterious mutations to persist. We tested this prediction experimentally using the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides, an insect with biparental care. For 20 generations, we allowed replicate experimental burying beetle populations to evolve either with post-hatching care (‘Full Care’ populations) or without it (‘No Care’ populations). We then established new lineages, seeded from these experimental populations, which we inbred to assess their mutation load. Outbred lineages served as controls. We also tested whether the deleterious effects of a greater mutation load could be concealed by parental care by allowing half the lineages to receive post-hatching care, while half did not. We found that inbred lineages from the Full Care populations went extinct more quickly than inbred lineages from the No Care populations – but only when offspring received no post-hatching care. We infer that Full Care lineages carried a greater mutation load, but that the associated deleterious effects on fitness could be overcome if larvae received parental care. We suggest that the increased mutation load caused by parental care increases a population’s dependence upon care. This could explain why care is seldom lost once it has evolved.
Funding
"The origin of the fittest: canalization, plasticity and selection as a consequence of provisioning during development"
European Research Council
Find out more...Wolfson Merit Award from the Royal Society, The Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2018-232) and The Isaac Newton Trust
Epigenetics and adaptive evolution within the family environment
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Find out more...Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI Grant Number: JP19K21569)
History
School
- Science
Department
- Mathematical Sciences
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological SciencesVolume
290Issue
1999Publisher
The Royal SocietyVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Rights holder
© The AuthorsPublisher statement
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by the Royal Society under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Acceptance date
2023-05-02Publication date
2023-05-24Copyright date
2023ISSN
0962-8452eISSN
1471-2954Publisher version
Language
- en