posted on 2022-01-20, 13:52authored byKate MathersKate Mathers, Christopher T Robinson, Christine Weber
Flow refugia, locations that maintain substrate stability and low hydraulic stress during periods of high flow, can ensure riverine resilience in the face of increasing hydrological unpredictability. Despite their known importance, they have been overlooked in recent years with work on drought refugia currently seeing greater attention. Moreover, research on the role of flow refugia during artificial flood pulses in regulated rivers, where flood disturbances are no longer part of the hydrograph, is essentially absent. Here, we compared flow refugia for benthic macroinvertebrates among six habitats (main channel, side channel, riffle, margin, lentic including a floodplain pond, and inundated floodplain) within four different sites in response to an artificial flood pulse. We found that the grain-size distribution and macroinvertebrate community composition changed at each site following the flood. Macroinvertebrate assemblages became longitudinally homogeneous, but within-site beta diversity and taxa richness remained temporally stable following the flood pulse, suggesting the presence of flow refugia. In this respect, margin, inundated floodplain and lentic (a floodplain pond) habitats provided important flow refugia locations, particularly for the mobile mayfly Rhithrogena sp. In contrast, low substrate stability in riffle and side channels resulted in limited refugia potential for most taxa. Refuge use was however patchy with high levels of intra-habitat variability being evident for Rhithrogena sp. and the amphipod Gammarus fossarum in margin and side channel habitats. Further work is required to advance our knowledge of flow refugia in rivers with differing flow regimes to enable their integration into management and restoration schemes.
Funding
Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) Grant 16.0113.PJ/P501-1050
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL)
Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology at ETH Zurich (VAW
Laboratory of Hydraulic Constructions at EPF Lausanne (LCH)
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Wiley under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/