Loughborough University
Browse

Patchiness in flow refugia use by macroinvertebrates following an artificial flood pulse

Download (1015.35 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-01-20, 13:52 authored by Kate MathersKate Mathers, Christopher T Robinson, Christine Weber
Flow refugia, locations that maintain substrate stability and low hydraulic stress during periods of high flow, can ensure riverine resilience in the face of increasing hydrological unpredictability. Despite their known importance, they have been overlooked in recent years with work on drought refugia currently seeing greater attention. Moreover, research on the role of flow refugia during artificial flood pulses in regulated rivers, where flood disturbances are no longer part of the hydrograph, is essentially absent. Here, we compared flow refugia for benthic macroinvertebrates among six habitats (main channel, side channel, riffle, margin, lentic including a floodplain pond, and inundated floodplain) within four different sites in response to an artificial flood pulse. We found that the grain-size distribution and macroinvertebrate community composition changed at each site following the flood. Macroinvertebrate assemblages became longitudinally homogeneous, but within-site beta diversity and taxa richness remained temporally stable following the flood pulse, suggesting the presence of flow refugia. In this respect, margin, inundated floodplain and lentic (a floodplain pond) habitats provided important flow refugia locations, particularly for the mobile mayfly Rhithrogena sp. In contrast, low substrate stability in riffle and side channels resulted in limited refugia potential for most taxa. Refuge use was however patchy with high levels of intra-habitat variability being evident for Rhithrogena sp. and the amphipod Gammarus fossarum in margin and side channel habitats. Further work is required to advance our knowledge of flow refugia in rivers with differing flow regimes to enable their integration into management and restoration schemes.

Funding

Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) Grant 16.0113.PJ/P501-1050

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL)

Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology at ETH Zurich (VAW

Laboratory of Hydraulic Constructions at EPF Lausanne (LCH)

History

School

  • Social Sciences and Humanities

Department

  • Geography and Environment

Published in

River Research and Applications

Volume

38

Issue

4

Pages

696-707

Publisher

Wiley

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© the Authors

Publisher statement

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Wiley under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

2021-12-17

Publication date

2022-01-19

Copyright date

2022

ISSN

1535-1459

eISSN

1535-1467

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr Kate Mathers. Deposit date: 20 January 2022

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC