Polarisation – A multiculturalist response
Theorists of multiculturalism are seldom thought to offer a response to polarisation and might even be thought to exacerbate it as their ideas are often claimed to be divisive. This article shows why once we have a clearer idea about what polarisation is and when it is a problem, the multiculturalist Bhikhu Parekh has plausible ideas about how to respond to it.Note that Bhikhu did not write about polarisation. Yet one indicator of the significance of a political thinker is that she or he has enough insight into the nature of political life for their ideas to have implications for features of political life they have said little or nothing about. This I believe is true of Bhikhu, and it is why his ideas can indicate how to respond to polarisation.I first show what polarisation is and when it becomes a problem. Second, I discuss why Bhikhu’s ideas offer a plausible response to it.
History
School
- Social Sciences and Humanities
Published in
EthnicitiesVolume
25Issue
1Pages
170 - 177Publisher
SAGE PublicationsVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Rights holder
© The Author(s)Publisher statement
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).Publication date
2025-01-03Copyright date
2025ISSN
1468-7968eISSN
1741-2706Publisher version
Language
- en