posted on 2015-02-12, 12:01authored byMark Freeman, Ben Groom
The aggregated term structure of social discount rates that results from Weitzman's (2001) survey of expert opinion is shown to be highly sensitive to the nature of the responses. If variation reflects irreducible differences in ethical judgments, the term structure can decline rapidly. If variation occurred because respondents were forecasting future rates under uncertainty, the term structure is much flatter because additional experts provide new information. The former approach triples the social cost of carbon when compared to the latter. The distinction between heterogeneity and uncertainty illustrates the need for a nuanced treatment of survey data in intergenerational policy making.
History
School
Business and Economics
Department
Business
Published in
The Economic Journal
Volume
125
Issue
585
Pages
1015 - 1024
Citation
FREEMAN, M. and GROOM, B., 2014. Positively gamma discounting: combining the opinions of experts on the social discount rate. The Economic Journal 125(585), pp.1015-1024.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publication date
2014-07-17
Notes
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: FREEMAN, M. and GROOM, B., 2014. Positively gamma discounting: combining the opinions of experts on the social discount rate. The Economic Journal 125(585), pp.1015-1024., which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12129. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.