Vidal - Plight of postfordism - WES - FINAL.pdf (246.83 kB)
Postfordism as a dysfunctional accumulation regime: A comparative analysis of the USA, the UK and Germany
journal contributionposted on 2017-11-24, 15:04 authored by Matt VidalMatt Vidal
The article seeks to reanimate the early regulation theory project of building Marxist political economy through the development of mid-range institutional theory. The concept of a mode of regulation - central to the Parisian wing of regulation theory - is rejected in favour of a distinction between functional and dysfunctional accumulation regimes. The Fordist regime of accumulation provided a unique institutional context allowing an extraordinary combination of high profits, rising real wages and strong GDP growth. In contrast, the postfordist regime is shown to be inherently dysfunctional, characterized by manifest tendencies toward stagnation and associated regressive trends in work and employment relations. A comparative analysis of profit rates, wage shares, growth rates and debt in the USA, UK and Germany shows that the single model of postfordism as a dysfunctional accumulation regime fits all three countries, although with important differences in forms of dysfunctionality. © The Author(s) 2013.
- Loughborough University London
Published inWork, Employment and Society
Pages451 - 471
CitationVIDAL, M., 2013. Postfordism as a dysfunctional accumulation regime: A comparative analysis of the USA, the UK and Germany. Work, Employment and Society, 27(3), pp. 451-471.
Publisher© The authors. Published by SAGE Journals
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statementThis work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
NotesThis paper was accepted for publication in the journal Work, Employment and Society and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013481876