Practical computational fluid dynamic predictions of a cyclist in a time trial position
On a flat road, at race speeds, aerodynamic drag is the main resistive force a cyclist must overcome. Computational Fluid Dynamics can be a useful tool to predict and understand the complex flow and therefore drive developments to reduce drag. However, cycling aerodynamics is complex. The effects of Reynolds number, surface roughness, boundary layer transition, flow separation and turbulent wakes are challenging to accurately predict. High fidelity time-resolved computations, such as Large Eddy Simulations, require high-performance computing and lengthy simulation times. This paper examines whether lower fidelity CFD, such as Reynolds averaged approaches, can predict the drag of a cyclist with sufficient accuracy and within practical timescales on a desktop PC. Wind tunnel tests of a rider model (without bicycle) were conducted at Reynolds numbers equivalent to speeds of ~20-70 km/h. Measured drag showed a notable Reynolds number dependency with the drag coefficient reducing almost linearly by ~20% from 0.88 to 0.71. The computational accurately replicated this relationship but only when employing a boundary layer transition model. The steady computations underpredicted the magnitude of the measured drag coefficient by ~3% but the unsteady computations were within ~2%. Examination of the predicted flow field revealed variations in boundary layer transition, separation and wake formation from each body part which combine in a complex wake system. Overall, the data confirm validity and suitable accuracy of the CFD and therefore this provides a practical time and cost-effective tool for further examination of drag reduction within cycling.
History
School
- Aeronautical, Automotive, Chemical and Materials Engineering
Department
- Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering
Published in
Sports EngineeringPublisher
SpringerVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/[insert DOI]Acceptance date
2024-09-16ISSN
1369-7072eISSN
1460-2687Publisher version
Language
- en