EFM paper Zhao.pdf (353.05 kB)
Download filePrediction of crack growth in a nickel-based superalloy under fatigue-oxidation conditions
journal contribution
posted on 2012-11-13, 11:18 authored by Liguo Zhao, Jie Tong, M.C. HardyPrediction of oxidation-assisted crack growth has been carried out for a nickel-based
superalloy at elevated temperature based on finite element analyses of oxygen diffusion,
coupled with viscoplastic deformation, near a fatigue crack tip. The material constitutive
behaviour, implemented in the finite element code ABAQUS via a user-defined material
subroutine (UMAT), was described by a unified viscoplastic model with non-linear kinematic
and isotropic hardening rules. Diffusion of oxygen was assumed to be controlled
by two parameters, the oxygen diffusivity and deformation-assisted oxygen mobility.
Low frequencies and superimposed hold periods at peak loads significantly enhanced oxygen
concentration near the crack tip. Evaluations of near-tip deformation and oxygen concentration
were performed, which led to the construction of a failure envelop for crack
growth based on the consideration of both oxygen concentration and accumulated inelastic
strain near the crack tip. The failure envelop was then utilised to predict crack growth rates
in a compact tension (CT) specimen under fatigue-oxidation conditions for selected loading
ranges, frequencies and dwell periods. The predictions from the fatigue-oxidation failure
envelop compared well with the experimental results for triangular and dwell loading
waveforms, with marked improvements achieved over those predicted from the viscoplastic
model alone. The fatigue-oxidation predictions also agree well with the experimental
results for slow-fast loading waveforms, but not for fast-slow waveforms where the effect
of oxidation is much reduced.
History
School
- Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering
Citation
ZHAO, L., TONG, J. and HARDY, M.C., 2010. Prediction of crack growth in a nickel-based superalloy under fatigue-oxidation conditions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 77 (6), pp.925-938.Publisher
© ElsevierVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publication date
2010Notes
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in the journal Engineering Fracture Mechanics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.005Publisher version
Language
- en