Two experiments were conducted to examine whether the conclusions drawn regarding the timing of anticipatory information pick-up from temporal occlusion studies are influenced by whether (a) the viewing period is of variable or fixed duration and (b) the task is a laboratory-based one with simple responses or a natural one requiring a coupled, interceptive movement response. Skilled and novice tennis players either made pencil-and-paper predictions of service direction (Experiment 1) or attempted to hit return strokes (Experiment 2) to tennis serves while their vision was temporally occluded in either a traditional progressive mode (where more information was revealed in each subsequent occlusion condition) or a moving window mode (where the visual display was only available for a fixed duration with this window shifted to different phases of the service action). Conclusions regarding the timing of information pick-up were generally consistent across display mode and across task setting lending support to the veracity and generalisability of findings regarding perceptual expertise in existing laboratory-based progressive temporal occlusion studies.
Funding
Appreciation is expressed to the Australian Sports Commission, and in particular to
the Australian Institute of Sport Tennis program, for the funding of Experiment 2.
History
School
Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Published in
Motor Control
Volume
9
Pages
332 - 351
Citation
FARROW, D., ABERNETHY, B. and JACKSON, R., 2005. Probing expert anticipation with the temporal occlusion paradigm: experimental investigations of some methodological issues. Motor Control, 9 (3), pp.332-351.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/