Loughborough University
Browse

Replacing sedentary time with physical activity and sleep: a 24-hour movement behaviour perspective on appetite control

journal contribution
posted on 2025-10-06, 11:08 authored by Sundus Malaikah, Arwa AlruwailiArwa Alruwaili, James SandersJames Sanders, Alice ThackrayAlice Thackray, David StenselDavid Stensel, David Thivel, Joseph Henson, Alex Rowlands, Scott Willis, James KingJames King
<p dir="ltr">Background: Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep are interdependent components of the 24-hour movement profile that may influence appetite control. While acute exercise can alter appetite perceptions and food reward, less is known about how reallocating time between daily behaviours affects appetite outcomes under free-living conditions. </p><p dir="ltr">Methods: We applied isotemporal-substitution modelling in a cross-sectional study of 130 young, healthy, active adults. Accelerometer-derived estimates of sedentary time, light physical activity (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and sleep were analysed in relation to energy intake (food diaries, laboratory meals), subjective appetite perceptions, appetite-related hormones (acylated ghrelin, PYY, leptin), and psychological traits, including food reward (Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire, LFPQ), food cravings (Control of Eating Questionnaire, CoEQ), and eating behaviour traits (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, TFEQ). </p><p dir="ltr">Results: Real-locating 30 minutes/day of sedentary time to MVPA was associated with higher energy intake in free-living (+113 kcal/day, 95% CI:34–192) and laboratory settings (+120 kcal/day, 95% CI:55–185), along with greater postprandial hunger and prospective food consumption, reduced fullness, elevated fasting acylated ghrelin, and lower postprandial PYY. No associations were observed for reallocations to LPA or sleep. Furthermore, sedentary time reallocations were unrelated to leptin or psychological eating traits assessed by the LFPQ, CoEQ, or TFEQ. </p><p dir="ltr">Conclusions: In this population, reallocating sedentary time to MVPA was linked to physiological and behavioural compensation consistent with elevated energy demands, whereas reallocating to LPA or sleep showed no associations. Trait-level eating behaviours were unaffected, suggesting MVPA influences appetite primarily through acute physiological rather than enduring cognitive or hedonic pathways.</p>

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Published in

Nutrients

Publisher

MDPI AG

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Rights holder

© The Author(s)

Publisher statement

This article is an Open Access article published by MDPI and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Acceptance date

2025-10-05

ISSN

2072-6643

eISSN

2072-6643

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr James King. Deposit date: 5 October 2025

Ethics review number

10980; 30/09/2022

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC