ijerph-16-02885-v2 (1).pdf (258.38 kB)
Download file

Reply to Mekary, R.A.; Ding, E.L. Isotemporal substitution as the gold standard model for physical activity epidemiology: why it is the most appropriate for activity time research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 797

Download (258.38 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 21.01.2022, 12:16 by Greg BiddleGreg Biddle, Charlotte Edwardson, Joseph Henson, Alex V Rowlands, Thomas Yates
Firstly, we would like to thank the authors for taking the time to review and comment on our paper. We believe it is invaluable to have open debates regarding current methodologies and the inference of research outputs. In the spirit of open debate and constructive discussion, we wish to respond to the observations of Mekary and Ding.

Funding

NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) East Midlands

NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Published in

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volume

16

Issue

16

Publisher

MDPI AG

Version

VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The Authors

Publisher statement

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by MDPI under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

29/07/2019

Publication date

2019-08-12

Copyright date

2019

ISSN

1661-7827

eISSN

1660-4601

Language

en

Depositor

Mr Greg Biddle. Deposit date: 20 January 2022

Article number

2885