posted on 2015-05-05, 14:40authored byDave Elder-Vass
This short reply seeks to clarify the concept of linguistic norm circles and to correct some misunderstandings of it implicit in Sealey & Carter's response. It also reinforces some doubts over their version of the linguistic system. Norm circles, it argues, provide an important part of the explanation for linguistic practices, but always in conjunction with other interacting causal powers.
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published in
JOURNAL FOR THE THEORY OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
282 - 287 (6)
Citation
ELDER-VASS, D., 2014. Reply to Sealey and Carter on realism and language. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44 (3), pp.282-287.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publication date
2014
Notes
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: ELDER-VASS, D., 2014. Reply to Sealey and Carter on realism and language. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44 (3), pp.282-287, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12042. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.