File(s) under embargo
Reason: Publisher requirement.
10
month(s)22
day(s)until file(s) become available
Resolving differences between MLSS and CP by considering rates of change of blood lactate during endurance exercise
Identification of the power output which separates the heavy intensity exercise domain, wherein steady states in blood [lactate] and pulmonary V̇O2 are achievable, from the severe intensity domain, wherein they are not, has conceptual and practical value in exercise physiology. Purpose To develop a new method that more closely represents the heavy-to-severe exercise domain boundary by evaluating the rates of blood lactate accumulation during the constant power output exercise bouts that are employed in the assessment of the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS). Methods Eight well-trained male cyclists completed five exercise tests of up to 30 min for determination of the traditional MLSS (MLSSTRAD) and a further four maximal tests for determination of critical power (CP). The rates of change of blood [lactate] between 10 min and the end of exercise in the MLSS tests were plotted against the corresponding power outputs and a two-segment linear regression model was used to identify individualised breakpoints in lactate accumulation vs. power output (MLSSMOD). Results MLSSMOD was significantly higher than MLSSTRAD (297 ± 41 vs. 278 ± 41 W; P < 0.001) but was not significantly different from CP (297 ± 41 W; P > 0.05); MLSSMOD and CP were closely aligned (r: 0.97; Bias: -0.52 W; SEE: 10 W; Limits of Agreement: -20 to 19 W). The rates of change of both blood [lactate] and V̇O2 were significantly greater, and exercise intolerance occurred before 30 min, at a power output slightly above MLSSMOD. Conclusions A novel method for evaluating blood lactate kinetics during a traditional MLSS protocol produces a modified MLSS that is not different from CP and better represents the heavy-to-severe exercise domain boundary.
History
School
- Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Published in
Medicine & Science in Sports & ExercisePublisher
Wolters Kluwer Health, IncVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Rights holder
© American College of Sports MedicinePublisher statement
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. The publisher version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003548Acceptance date
2024-08-19Publication date
2024-08-26Copyright date
2024ISSN
0195-9131eISSN
1530-0315Publisher version
Language
- en