<p dir="ltr">This study re-examines the long-term effect of traditional plough use on contemporary gender roles, as originally advanced by Alesina, Giuliano and Nunn [Quarterly Journal of Economics (2013) Vol. 128, pp. 469 – 530]. The findings demonstrate that the reduced-form relationship between historical plough adoption and female empowerment is robust to implementing a falsification test, using alternative proxies for gender roles, and accounting for potential selection bias from unobservables and spatial dependence. Additional evidence indicates that ancestral plough adoption reinforced the persistence of gender-biased norms, reflected in oral traditions, that continue to shape present-day gender inequality. However, the intergenerational transmission of these norms is substantially weaker in societies whose ancestors were exposed to unstable climatic environments between 500 CE and 1900 CE, suggesting that ancestral instability constrained the cultural persistence of plough-induced gender roles.</p>
History
School
Loughborough Business School
Published in
Journal of applied econometrics
Publisher
Wiley
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI].
This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.