Loughborough University
Browse

Selective admission into stroke unit and patient outcomes: A tale of four cities

Download (316.73 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-03-07, 12:13 authored by Farasat BokhariFarasat Bokhari, Ian Wellwood, Anthony G Rudd, Peter Langhorne, Martin S Dennis, Charles DA Wolfe
Care of stroke patients costs considerably more in specialized stroke units (SU) compared to care in general medical wards (GMW) but the technology may be cost effective if it leads to significantly improved outcomes. While randomized control trials show better outcomes for stroke patients admitted to SU, observational studies report mixed findings. In this paper we use individual level data from first-ever stroke patients in four European cities and find evidence of selection by the initial severity of stroke into SU in some cities. In these cases, the impact of admission to SU on outcomes is overestimated by multivariate logit models even after controlling for case-mix. However, when the imbalance in patient characteristics and severity of stroke by admission to SU and GMW is adjusted using propensity score methods, the differences in outcomes are no longer statistically significant in most cases. Our analysis explains why earlier studies using observational data have found mixed results on the benefits of admission to SU.

Funding

Modelling, evaluating and implementing cost effective services to reduce the impact of stroke

National Institute for Health Research

Find out more...

Funded by the European Union Fifth Framework

The Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals Charity

The Stanley Thomas Johnson Foundation

The Stroke Association

DH HQIP funding

History

School

  • Loughborough Business School

Published in

Health Economics Review

Volume

4

Pages

1 - 10

Publisher

Springer

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© Bokhari et al.

Publisher statement

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Acceptance date

2013-12-17

Publication date

2014-01-01

Copyright date

2014

Notes

The Journal article is CC BY 2.0. not CC BY 3.0

eISSN

2191-1991

Language

  • en

Depositor

Prof Farasat Bokhari. Deposit date: 3 September 2024

Article number

1

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC