Loughborough University
Browse
prosthesis-06-00013-v2.pdf (2.25 MB)

Shape analysis of prosthetic socket rectification procedure for transtibial amputees

Download (2.25 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-04-12, 09:46 authored by Yogeshvaran R Nagarajan, Farukh Farukh, Vadim SilberschmidtVadim Silberschmidt, Karthikeyan Kandan, Amit Kumar Singh, Pooja Mukul
Achieving a comfortable socket residual limb interface is crucial for effective prosthetic rehabilitation, depending on the precise characterisation and fluctuations in the shape and volume of residual limbs. Clinicians rely on subjective and iterative methods for shaping sockets, often involving a trial-and-error approach. This study introduces a framework for measuring, analysing, and comparing residual limb shape and volume using scanned data to facilitate more informed clinical decision-making. Surface scans of 44 transtibial residual limb casts of various sizes and lengths were examined. All scans were spatially aligned to a mid-patella and subjected to analysis using a shape analysis toolbox. Geometric measurements were extracted, with particular attention to significant rectified regions during the cast rectification process. Following PTB guidelines, our analysis revealed substantial alterations, primarily in the mid-patella region, followed by the patellar tendon area. Notably, there was a significant volume change of 6.02% in the region spanning from mid-patella to 25% of the cast length. Beyond this point, linear cast modifications were observed for most amputees up to 60% of the cast length, followed by individual-specific deviations beyond this region. Regardless of residual limb size and length, the modifications applied to positive casts suggested categorising patients into five major groups. This study employs the AmpScan shape analysis tool, to comprehend the cast rectification process used for capturing and assessing the extent of rectification on patients’ residual limb casts. The clinical implications of our research are threefold: (a) the comparison data can serve as training resources for junior prosthetists; (b) this will aid prosthetists in identifying specific regions for rectification and assessing socket fit; (c) it will help in determining optimal timing for prosthetic fitting or replacement.

Funding

Academy of Medical Sciences under Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) Scheme (grant number: GCRFNG\100125)

UK’s Royal Academy of Engineering grant no. FF\1920\1\30

History

School

  • Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering

Published in

Prosthesis

Volume

6

Issue

1

Pages

157 - 174

Publisher

MDPI

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The authors

Publisher statement

This article is an Open Access article published by MDPI and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Acceptance date

2024-01-29

Publication date

2024-02-05

Copyright date

2024

eISSN

2673-1592

Language

  • en

Depositor

Prof Vadim Silberschmidt. Deposit date: 9 April 2024

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC