posted on 2018-08-14, 12:51authored byWilliam D. Riley, Edward C. Potter, Jeremy Biggs, A.L. Collins, Helen P. Jarvie, J. Iwan Jones, Mary Kelly-Quinn, Steve J. Ormerod, D.A. Sear, Robert WilbyRobert Wilby, Samantha Broadmeadow, Colin D. Brown, Paul Chanin, Gordon H. Copp, I.G. Cowx, Adam Grogan, Duncan D. Hornby, Duncan Huggett, Martyn G. Kelly, Marc Naura, Jonathan R. Newman, Gavin M. Siriwardena
Small, 1st and 2nd-order, headwater streams and ponds play essential roles in providing natural flood control, trapping sediments and contaminants, retaining nutrients, and maintaining biological diversity, which extend into downstream reaches, lakes and estuaries. However, the large geographic extent and high connectivity of these small water bodies with the surrounding terrestrial ecosystem makes them particularly vulnerable to growing land-use pressures and environmental change. The greatest pressure on the physical processes in these waters has been their extension and modification for agricultural and forestry drainage, resulting in highly modified discharge and temperature regimes that have implications for flood and drought control further downstream. The extensive length of the small stream network exposes rivers to a wide range of inputs, including nutrients, pesticides, heavy metals, sediment and emerging contaminants. Small water bodies have also been affected by invasions of non-native species, which along with the physical and chemical pressures, have affected most groups of organisms with consequent implications for the wider biodiversity within the catchment. Reducing the impacts and restoring the natural ecosystem function of these water bodies requires a three-tiered approach based on: restoration of channel hydromorphological dynamics; restoration and management of the riparian zone; and management of activities in the wider catchment that have both point-source and diffuse impacts. Such activities are expensive and so emphasis must be placed on integrated programmes that provide multiple benefits. Practical options need to be promoted through legislative regulation, financial incentives, markets for resource services and voluntary codes and actions.
Funding
Production of this paper has been supported in part by the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) under contract SF0272; Rothamsted Research receives strategic funding from the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and ALC was funded by BBSRC grant BBS/E/C/000I0330; HPJ was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (National Capability Research project NEC05966: The Strategic Importance of Headwaters for UK Water Resources).
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Geography and Environment
Published in
Science of the Total Environment
Volume
645
Pages
1598 - 1616
Citation
RILEY, W.D. ... et al, 2018. Small Water Bodies in Great Britain and Ireland: Ecosystem function, human-generated degradation, and options for restorative action. Science of the Total Environment, 645, pp.1598-1616.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/
Publication date
2018
Notes
This is an open access article under the Open Government License (OGL)(http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/opengovernment-licence/version/3/).