The paper will seek to analyse the internal debate that has raged throughout the party’s
history as to what constitutes the most appropriate form of political communication. Two
contrasting views are identified: these are “educationalism,” that is the belief that the best
way to win public support is through a determined and sustained political education
programme relying on meetings, leaflets, labour intensive grassroots' work and informed
debate; by contrast what is labelled “persuasionalism” sees the media and mass
communication as central to campaigning and places emphasis on the less tangential, image
based appeals to what are perceived to be the largely disinterested electorate. The discussion
will assess the centrality of the educationalist perspective to Labour Party strategy in the early
part of its existence, that is the first half of this century. What will then be demonstrated is
how what has broadly been defined as persuasionalism first challenged and then supplanted
educationalism as the dominant party approach to electioneering. Discussion will note that
Labour, probably like most social democratic parties, has contained elements hostile to the
mass media as an agency of political communication. As the paper will show this is not
something unique to contemporary debate, and has in fact been a key theme of strategic
discussion throughout the party's history.
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Pages
48578 bytes
Citation
WRING, D., 1997. Soundbites versus Socialism: the changing campaign philosophy of the British Labour Party. Javnost, 4(3), pp.59-68