Stakeholder acceptance of shared toilets to improve sanitation access in low-income urban settings: a case study of Gulu city, Uganda
With growing worldwide urbanisation, ensuring adequate sanitation for all urban citizens is gaining importance. Access to sufficient and appropriate sanitation presents particular challenges for low-income areas of high population density. In Gulu city, Uganda, 87% of the population relies on shared sanitation facilities. This paper investigates under what circumstances shared toilets can offer access to improved sanitation facilities. It explores stakeholders' perceptions of shared toilets – users, political leaders, and key decision-makers of Gulu. Findings are analysed from an existing dataset of over 10,000 households, alongside qualitative data from household interviews, key informant interviews with health inspectors, health workers, political leaders, and focus group discussions. Results reveal that shared toilets have the potential to improve access to enhanced sanitation technology in areas where people lack the space and financial means to construct individual household toilets. For shared toilets to be acceptable, they would be of a higher sanitation technology, located on private land, with the familiarity of users, and agreed cleaning and maintenance regimes. The paper, therefore, proposes improving both the technology and arrangements for the use of shared facilities, to a level that satisfies users and improves access to safe sanitation in low-income urban areas.
History
School
- Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering
Research Unit
- Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC)
Published in
Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for DevelopmentVolume
13Issue
1Pages
11–18Publisher
IWA PublishingVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Rights holder
© The AuthorsPublisher statement
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Acceptance date
2022-12-09Publication date
2022-12-21Copyright date
2022ISSN
2043-9083eISSN
2408-9362Publisher version
Language
- en