posted on 2015-01-28, 13:37authored byMichael Mair, Christian Greiffenhagen, Wes Sharrock
As a contribution to current debates on the ‘social life of methods’, in this article we
present an ethnomethodological study of the role of understanding within statistical
practice. After reviewing the empirical turn in the methods literature and the challenges
to the qualitative-quantitative divide it has given rise to, we argue such case
studies are relevant because they enable us to see different ways in which ‘methods’,
here quantitative methods, come to have a social life – by embodying and exhibiting
understanding they ‘make the social structures of everyday activities observable’
(Garfinkel, 1967: 75), thereby putting society on display. Exhibited understandings
rest on distinctive lines of practical social and cultural inquiry – ethnographic ‘forays’
into the worlds of the producers and users of statistics – which are central to good
statistical work but are not themselves quantitative. In highlighting these non-statistical
forms of social and cultural inquiry at work in statistical practice, our case study
is an addition to understandings of statistics and usefully points to ways in which
studies of the social life of methods might be further developed from here.
Funding
This research was made possible by the ESRC through funding to the NCRM [grant number:
RES-576-25-0022].
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published in
Theory, Culture and Society: explorations in critical social science
Volume
n/a
Issue
n/a
Pages
n/a - ?
Citation
MAIR, M., GREIFFENHAGEN, C. and SHARROCK, W., 2016. Statistical practice: putting society on display. Theory, Culture and Society, 33(3), pp.51-77.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Publication date
2016
Notes
This is an Open Access Article (CC-BY 3.0). It is published by SAGE as Open Access at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276414559058