TKL 2011 online first Biza LU Repository.pdf (1.03 MB)
Students’ evolving meaning about tangent line with the mediation of a dynamic geometry environment and an instructional example space
journal contributionposted on 2011-09-28, 12:03 authored by Irene Biza
In this paper I report a lengthy episode from a teaching experiment in which fifteen Year 12 Greek students negotiated their definitions of tangent line to a function graph. The experiment was designed for the purpose of introducing students to the notion of derivative and to the general case of tangent to a function graph. Its design was based on previous research results on students’ perspectives on tangency, especially in their transition from Geometry to Analysis. In this experiment an instructional example space of functions was used in an electronic environment utilising Dynamic Geometry software with Function Grapher tools. Following the Vygotskian approach according to which students’ knowledge develops in specific social and cultural contexts, students’ construction of the meaning of tangent line was observed in the classroom throughout the experiment. The analysis of the classroom data collected during the experiment focused on the evolution of students’ personal meanings about tangent line of function graph in relation to: the electronic environment; the pre-prepared as well as spontaneous examples; students’ engagement in classroom discussion; and, the role of researcher as a teacher. The analysis indicated that the evolution of students’ meanings towards a more sophisticated understanding of tangency was not linear. Also it was interrelated with the evolution of the meaning they had about the inscriptions in the electronic environment; the instructional example space; the classroom discussion; and, the role of the teacher.
- Mathematics Education Centre
CitationBIZA, I., 2011. Students’ evolving meaning about tangent line with the mediation of a dynamic geometry environment and an instructional example space. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 16 (2), pp.125-151.
Publisher© Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
NotesThis article was published in the journal, Technology, Knowledge and Learning [© Springer Science + Business Media] and the original publication is available at www.springerlink.com