Loughborough University
Browse
2020 Morris et al Environmental Health review s12940-020-00641-7 (1).pdf (1.21 MB)

Sustainable solutions to mitigate occupational heat strain – an umbrella review of physiological effects and global health perspectives

Download (1.21 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-09-08, 14:01 authored by Nathan B Morris, Ollie Jay, Andreas D Flouris, Ana Casanueva, Chuansi Gao, Josh Foster, George HavenithGeorge Havenith, Lars Nybo
Background: Climate change is set to exacerbate occupational heat strain, the combined effect of environmental and internal heat stress on the body, threatening human health and wellbeing. Therefore, identifying effective, affordable, feasible and sustainable solutions to mitigate the negative effects on worker health and productivity, is an increasingly urgent need. Objectives: To systematically identify and evaluate methods that mitigate occupational heat strain in order to provide scientific-based guidance for practitioners.
Methods: An umbrella review was conducted in biomedical databases employing the following eligibility criteria: 1) ambient temperatures > 28 °C or hypohydrated participants, 2) healthy adults, 3) reported psychophysiological (thermal comfort, heart rate or core temperature) and/or performance (physical or cognitive) outcomes, 4) written in English, and 5) published before November 6, 2019. A second search for original research articles was performed to identify interventions of relevance but lacking systematic reviews. All identified interventions were independently evaluated by all co-authors on four point scales for effectiveness, cost, feasibility and environmental impact.
Results: Following screening, 36 systematic reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The most effective solutions at mitigating occupational heat strain were wearing specialized cooling garments, (physiological) heat acclimation, improving aerobic fitness, cold water immersion, and applying ventilation. Although air-conditioning and cooling garments in ideal settings provide best scores for effectiveness, the limited applicability in certain industrial settings, high economic cost and high environmental impact are drawbacks for these solutions. However, (physiological) acclimatization, planned breaks, shading and optimized clothing properties are attractive alternative solutions when economic and ecological sustainability aspects are included in the overall evaluation.
Discussion: Choosing the most effective solution or combinations of methods to mitigate occupational heat strain will be scenario-specific. However, this paper provides a framework for integrating effectiveness, cost, feasibility (indoors and outdoor) and ecologic sustainability to provide occupational health and safety professionals with evidence-based guidelines.

Funding

European Commission Horizon 2020 Grant (668786 – Heat-Shield)

History

School

  • Design and Creative Arts

Department

  • Design

Published in

Environmental Health

Volume

19

Issue

1

Pages

95

Publisher

BMC

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The authors

Publisher statement

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by BMC under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

2020-08-12

Publication date

2020-09-04

Copyright date

2020

eISSN

1476-069X

Language

  • en

Depositor

Prof George Havenith. Deposit date: 7 September 2020

Article number

95

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC