posted on 2020-09-08, 14:01authored byNathan B Morris, Ollie Jay, Andreas D Flouris, Ana Casanueva, Chuansi Gao, Josh Foster, George HavenithGeorge Havenith, Lars Nybo
Background: Climate change is set to exacerbate occupational heat strain, the combined effect of environmental
and internal heat stress on the body, threatening human health and wellbeing. Therefore, identifying effective,
affordable, feasible and sustainable solutions to mitigate the negative effects on worker health and productivity, is
an increasingly urgent need.
Objectives: To systematically identify and evaluate methods that mitigate occupational heat strain in order to
provide scientific-based guidance for practitioners. Methods: An umbrella review was conducted in biomedical databases employing the following eligibility criteria:
1) ambient temperatures > 28 °C or hypohydrated participants, 2) healthy adults, 3) reported psychophysiological
(thermal comfort, heart rate or core temperature) and/or performance (physical or cognitive) outcomes, 4) written
in English, and 5) published before November 6, 2019. A second search for original research articles was performed
to identify interventions of relevance but lacking systematic reviews. All identified interventions were independently
evaluated by all co-authors on four point scales for effectiveness, cost, feasibility and environmental impact.
Results: Following screening, 36 systematic reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The most effective solutions at
mitigating occupational heat strain were wearing specialized cooling garments, (physiological) heat acclimation,
improving aerobic fitness, cold water immersion, and applying ventilation. Although air-conditioning and cooling
garments in ideal settings provide best scores for effectiveness, the limited applicability in certain industrial settings,
high economic cost and high environmental impact are drawbacks for these solutions. However, (physiological)
acclimatization, planned breaks, shading and optimized clothing properties are attractive alternative solutions when
economic and ecological sustainability aspects are included in the overall evaluation. Discussion: Choosing the most effective solution or combinations of methods to mitigate occupational heat strain
will be scenario-specific. However, this paper provides a framework for integrating effectiveness, cost, feasibility
(indoors and outdoor) and ecologic sustainability to provide occupational health and safety professionals with
evidence-based guidelines.
Funding
European Commission Horizon 2020 Grant (668786 – Heat-Shield)
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by BMC under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/