Work-journal-08-RM-corrected.pdf (614.07 kB)
Download file

The HADRIAN approach to accessible transport

Download (614.07 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 11.03.2010, 13:50 authored by Russell MarshallRussell Marshall, J. Mark Porter, Ruth Sims, Steve SummerskillSteve Summerskill, Diane GyiDiane Gyi, Keith CaseKeith Case
This paper describes research carried out at Loughborough University in the UK into the areas of 'design for all' and accessible transport. The research addresses two common needs for designers and ergonomists working towards developing more inclusive products and environments, namely data on users that is accessible, valid, and applicable and a means of utilising the data to assess the accessibility of designs during the early stages of development. HADRIAN is a computer-based inclusive design tool that has been developed to support designers in their efforts to develop products that meet the needs of a broader range of users. Currently HADRIAN is being expanded to support transport design. This includes data on an individual's ability to undertake a variety of transport-related tasks, such as vehicle ingress/egress, coping with uneven surfaces, steps, street furniture and complex pedestrian environments. The subsequent use of this data will be supported either through a task analysis system that will allow a designer to evaluate a design for a part of the transport infrastructure (ticket barrier, train carriage etc.), or alternatively allow the designer or an end user to evaluate a whole journey. The 'journey planner' feature of the HADRIAN tool will compare an individual's physical, cognitive and emotional abilities with the demands placed upon that individual by the mode(s) of transport available and the route options selected. It is envisaged that these developments will prove extremely useful to users, designers, planners and all those involved with transport use and implementation.



  • Design


MARSHALL, R. ... et al, 2009. The HADRIAN approach to accessible transport. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 33 (3), pp. 335-344


© IOS Press


AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at:

Publication date



This article was published in the journal, Work: a Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation [© IOS Press] and is also available at: