The use of email by employees at the Danwood Group was studied and it was found that the interrupt
effect from emails is more than generally believed. Employees allowed themselves to be interrupted almost as
frequently as telephone calls and the common reaction to the arrival of an email is to react almost as quickly as
they would respond to telephone calls. This means the interrupt effect is comparable with that of a telephone
call. The recovery time from an email interruption was found to be significantly less than the published recovery
time for telephone calls. It is to be concluded, therefore, that while Email is still less disruptive than the
telephone, the way the majority of users handle their incoming email has been shown to give far more
interruption than expected.
By analysing the data captured the authors have been able to create recommendations for a set of
guidelines for email usage within the workplace that will increase employee efficiency by reducing the
prominence of interruptions, restricting the use of email-to-all messages, setting-up the email application to
display three lines of the email and to check for email less frequently. It is recommended that training should be
given to staff on how to use email more effectively to increase employee productivity.
History
School
Science
Department
Information Science
Pages
86720 bytes
Citation
Jackson, T., Dawson, R. and Wilson, D., 2001. The cost of email interruption. Journal of Systems and Information Technology , 5(1), pp. 81-92