posted on 2017-03-16, 13:58authored byMartin J. Turner, Mark S. Allen, Matthew J. Slater, Jamie BarkerJamie Barker, Charlotte Woodcock, Chris Harwood, Ken McFayden
The growing use of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) in performance contexts
(e.g., business, sport) has highlighted the absence of a contextually valid and reliable measure of irrational beliefs. This paper reports the development and initial validation of the Irrational Performance Beliefs Inventory (iPBI). The iPBI was developed to provide a validated measure of the four core irrational beliefs of REBT theory. Item development was completed
in three stages comprising two expert panels and one novice panel, reducing and refining 176 items to 133. Then, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to refine the measure and reduce the number of items. A total of 665 business professionals completed the 133-item scale, alongside an established measure of irrational beliefs and a measure of negative emotion. A 28-item measure was developed (the iPBI) that showed an acceptable fit to the four-factor REBT structure. The iPBI correlated well with the established irrational beliefs measure, and with anxiety, depression, and anger, demonstrating concurrent and predictive validity. Further validation efforts are required to assess the validity and reliability of the iPBI in alternative samples in other performance-related contexts.
History
School
Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Published in
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
174-180
Citation
TURNER, M.J. ...et al., 2016. The development and initial validation of the irrational performance beliefs inventory (iPBI). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34 (3), pp.174-180.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Acceptance date
2015-07-07
Publication date
2016-04-22
Copyright date
2018
Notes
This version of the article may not completely replicate the final version published in European Journal of Psychological Assessment. It is not the version of record and is therefore not suitable for citation.