posted on 2014-03-12, 10:08authored byChristian Greiffenhagen
Sociology has been accused of neglecting the importance of material things in
human life and the material aspects of social practices. Efforts to correct this have
recently been made, with a growing concern to demonstrate the materiality of
social organization, not least through attention to objects and the body.As a result,
there have been a plethora of studies reporting the social construction and effects
of a variety of material objects as well as studies that have explored the material
dimensions of a diversity of practices. In different ways these studies have questioned
the Cartesian dualism of a strict separation of ‘mind’ and ‘body’. However,
it could be argued that the idea of the mind as immaterial has not been entirely
banished and lingers when it comes to discussing abstract thinking and reasoning.
The aim of this article is to extend the material turn to abstract thought, using
mathematics as a paradigmatic example.
This paper explores how writing mathematics (on paper, blackboards, or even in
the air) is indispensable for doing and thinking mathematics.The paper is based on
video recordings of lectures in formal logic and investigates how mathematics is
presented at the blackboard. The paper discusses the iconic character of blackboards
in mathematics and describes in detail a number of inscription practices
of presenting mathematics at the blackboard (such as the use of lines and boxes,
the designation of particular regions for specific mathematical purposes, as well
as creating an ‘architecture’ visualizing the overall structure of the proof). The
paper argues that doing mathematics really is ‘thinking with eyes and hands’
(Latour 1986). Thinking in mathematics is inextricably interwoven with writing
mathematics.
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Citation
GREIFFENHAGEN, C., 2014. The materiality of mathematics: presenting mathematics at the blackboard. British Journal of Sociology, 65 (3), pp. 502-528