column 32.2Curran Fray pp10 to 15.pdf (169.36 kB)
Time savings with ceiling track hoist systems.
From the perspective of the Patient Handling Advisor (PHA), time is often used as a
defence against using the appropriate or prescribed equipment for high-risk patient
transfers. Anecdotal comments report that there is a perceived amount of extra time
required to collect the equipment, place the equipment in the correct position and
then complete the transfer. In published evidence, time studies have not been used
to support the implementation of hoisting in clinical practice since Bell (1984), though
some studies did collect time as part of their data (e.g. Alamgir et al 2009).
However, the evidence that supports the use of hoists has been well documented in
many studies. Jung & Bridge (2009) in a systematic review reported evidence to
suggest a decrease in musculoskeletal injuries and physical stress when they
compared a mobile hoist with manual handling techniques. Though other reviews
(Hegewald et al 2018; Martimo et al 2008; Dawson et al 2007) still cast doubt over
the full benefits of the implementation of assistive technology as a method to reduce
musculoskeletal injuries, however hoist use has become accepted best practice for
full weight patient transfers (Smith 2011; ISO 2012).....
History
School
- Design and Creative Arts
Department
- Design
Published in
ColumnVolume
32Issue
2Pages
10-15Publisher
National Back Exchange UKVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Publisher statement
Reproduced with permission of the publisherAcceptance date
2020-06-17Publication date
2020-10-05ISSN
1835-3487Publisher version
Language
- en